Xeon D-1813NT vs Pentium G640T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G640T
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.72
Xeon D-1813NT
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 42 Watt
4.87
+576%

Xeon D-1813NT outperforms Pentium G640T by a whopping 576% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26901237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.9510.97
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)10240 KB
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt42 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G640T 0.72
Xeon D-1813NT 4.87
+576%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G640T 1139
Xeon D-1813NT 7732
+579%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 4.87
Recency 3 June 2012 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 42 Watt

Pentium G640T has 20% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1813NT, on the other hand, has a 576.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon D-1813NT is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G640T in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G640T is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G640T and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G640T
Pentium G640T
Intel Xeon D-1813NT
Xeon D-1813NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Pentium G640T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1813NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G640T or Xeon D-1813NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.