Xeon E5-2670 v4 vs Pentium G640

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2561	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	no data	Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency	1.24	no data
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date	3 June 2012 (12 years ago)	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads	2	28
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz
Bus type	no data	QPI
Bus rate	5 GT/s	2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	31
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	3.5 MB
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	35 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	131 mm2	306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	no data
Number of transistors	504 million	4700 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA1155	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	32 GB	1,536 GB
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	17 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	40

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	3 June 2012	20 June 2016
Physical cores	2	14
Threads	2	28
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	120 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G640 and Xeon E5-2670 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---