Ultra 5 225F vs Pentium G620T

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G620T
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
Core Ultra 5 225F
2025
10 cores / 10 threads, 65 Watt
19.22
+3332%

Core Ultra 5 225F outperforms Pentium G620T by a whopping 3332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2886313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0065.14
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.5228.09
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$231

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 225F has 2071% better value for money than Pentium G620T.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data4
Threads210
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size131 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size32 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium G620T 0.56
Ultra 5 225F 19.22
+3332%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G620T 896
Ultra 5 225F 30789
+3336%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 19.22
Recency 22 May 2011 7 January 2025
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium G620T has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 225F, on the other hand, has a 3332.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 225F is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G620T in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G620T
Pentium G620T
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Pentium G620T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 225F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium G620T and Core Ultra 5 225F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.