Sempron 3000+ vs Pentium G620

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2633not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.43no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.11no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)128 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size131 mm2144 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155939
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G620 1213
+324%
Sempron 3000+ 286

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2011 1 October 2005
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 62 Watt

Pentium G620 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 3000+, on the other hand, has 4.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G620 and Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G620
Pentium G620
AMD Sempron 3000+
Sempron 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 504 votes

Rate Pentium G620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 80 votes

Rate Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G620 or Sempron 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.