Ryzen 3 4300G vs Pentium G620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G620
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76
Ryzen 3 4300G
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.80
+795%

Ryzen 3 4300G outperforms Pentium G620 by a whopping 795% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26541029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.43no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.109.85
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size131 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon Vega 6
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G620 0.76
Ryzen 3 4300G 6.80
+795%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G620 1208
Ryzen 3 4300G 10809
+795%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 6.80
Integrated graphics card 0.77 3.04
Recency 22 May 2011 21 July 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 3 4300G has a 794.7% higher aggregate performance score, 294.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 4300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G620 and Ryzen 3 4300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G620
Pentium G620
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Ryzen 3 4300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 512 votes

Rate Pentium G620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 168 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G620 or Ryzen 3 4300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.