Athlon 3000G vs Pentium G4400TE
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 3000G outperforms Pentium G4400TE by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2123 | 1589 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.99 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Pentium | AMD Athlon |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Zen+ (2018−2020) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) | 7 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | $49 |
| Current price | no data | $211 (4.3x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm | 209.78 mm2? |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 4940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB? |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Athlon 3000G outperforms Pentium G4400TE by 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon 3000G outperforms Pentium G4400TE by 105% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.42 | 2.90 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.37 | 2.98 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 7 November 2019 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Cost | $64 | $49 |
Athlon 3000G has a 104.2% higher aggregate performance score, 117.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and its recommended price lower by $15.
The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G4400TE in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium G4400TE is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G4400TE and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
