Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Pentium G4400
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2082 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.61 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
Power efficiency | 2.84 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 10 October 2004 (20 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | $180 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 33 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 63 °C |
Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 105 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1151 | 939 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 September 2015 | 10 October 2004 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 104 Watt |
Pentium G4400 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 92.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G4400 and Athlon 64 FX-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.