Celeron 3205U vs Pentium G3220

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3220
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.21
+98.4%
Celeron 3205U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.61

Pentium G3220 outperforms Celeron 3205U by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23412793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.083.78
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$71$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz800 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1211.2/12
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3220 1.21
+98.4%
Celeron 3205U 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3220 1892
+99.8%
Celeron 3205U 947

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G3220 529
+98.9%
Celeron 3205U 266

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G3220 887
+85.2%
Celeron 3205U 479

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.61
Recency 1 September 2013 1 March 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium G3220 has a 98.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 3205U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 253.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G3220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3205U in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3220 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3205U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3220 and Celeron 3205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3220
Pentium G3220
Intel Celeron 3205U
Celeron 3205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 352 votes

Rate Pentium G3220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 31 vote

Rate Celeron 3205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3220 or Celeron 3205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.