Athlon II X2 210e vs Pentium G2020

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G2020
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.07
+52.9%
Athlon II X2 210e
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.70

Pentium G2020 outperforms Athlon II X2 210e by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24142706
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.831.47
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date21 January 2013 (11 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size94 mm2117 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G2020 1.07
+52.9%
Athlon II X2 210e 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G2020 1691
+53%
Athlon II X2 210e 1105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 0.70
Recency 21 January 2013 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

Pentium G2020 has a 52.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II X2 210e, on the other hand, has 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G2020 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 210e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2020 and Athlon II X2 210e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G2020
Pentium G2020
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
Athlon II X2 210e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 632 votes

Rate Pentium G2020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 210e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G2020 or Athlon II X2 210e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.