EPYC 9175F vs Pentium Extreme Edition 965
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2774 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.45 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Presler (2005−2007) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 26 March 2006 (18 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $4,256 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.733 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.73 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 512 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | 16x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 376 million | 133,040 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 775 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 March 2006 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 320 Watt |
Pentium Extreme Edition 965 has 146.2% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium Extreme Edition 965 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Extreme Edition 965 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
