Pentium G6950 vs Pentium E6800
Aggregate performance score
Pentium G6950 outperforms Pentium E6800 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2663 | 2624 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | 1.01 |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 29 August 2010 (14 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $831 | $60 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Pentium G6950 has 200% better value for money than Pentium E6800.
Detailed specifications
Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.33 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 382 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA1156 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16.38 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Recency | 29 August 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 73 Watt |
Pentium E6800 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 12.3% lower power consumption.
Pentium G6950, on the other hand, has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6800 and Pentium G6950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
