Pentium 4 1.80 vs Pentium E6600
Aggregate performance score
Pentium E6600 outperforms Pentium 4 1.80 by a whopping 914% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2716 | 3409 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | 0.10 |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Willamette (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 17 January 2010 (14 years ago) | August 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $16 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.06 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.07 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 42 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V – 1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 67 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.71 | 0.07 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 67 Watt |
Pentium E6600 has a 914.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 3.1% lower power consumption.
The Pentium E6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 1.80 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6600 and Pentium 4 1.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
