Celeron M 630 MHz vs Pentium E6500K
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Celeron M |
Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | no data |
Release date | 9 August 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 0.63 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V – 1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | LGA775 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pentium E6500K has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 630 MHz, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium E6500K is a desktop processor while Celeron M 630 MHz is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6500K and Celeron M 630 MHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.