Phenom X3 8750 vs Pentium E5700

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5700
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68
Phenom X3 8750
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.91
+33.8%

Phenom X3 8750 outperforms Pentium E5700 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27242526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.990.91
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Toliman (2008)
Release date8 August 2010 (14 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm2285 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5700 0.68
Phenom X3 8750 0.91
+33.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5700 1081
Phenom X3 8750 1445
+33.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium E5700 324
+7.6%
Phenom X3 8750 301

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium E5700 520
Phenom X3 8750 782
+50.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.91
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Pentium E5700 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

Phenom X3 8750, on the other hand, has a 33.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Phenom X3 8750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5700 and Phenom X3 8750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5700
Pentium E5700
AMD Phenom X3 8750
Phenom X3 8750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 945 votes

Rate Pentium E5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 70 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5700 or Phenom X3 8750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.