E1-7010 vs Pentium Dual Core T3400
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3400 and E1-7010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | AMD E-Series |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Carrizo-L (2015) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (15 years ago) | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T3400 and E1-7010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 930 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T3400 and E1-7010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | FP4 BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and E1-7010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Pentium Dual Core T3400 outperforms E1-7010 by 11% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 7 May 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
E1-7010 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and E1-7010. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and E1-7010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
