Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Pentium Dual T2330
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Dual Core T2330 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T2330 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3061 | 3332 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium Dual Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.92 | 0.18 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | June 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T2330 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T2330 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 68 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T2330 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T2330 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.13 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 68 Watt |
Pentium Dual T2330 has a 161.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 94.3% lower power consumption.
The Pentium Dual Core T2330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T2330 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
