Xeon 3.20 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)8 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size77 mm2237 mm2
Number of transistors105 million286 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket775604
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt97 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual-Core E2160 648
+35.6%
Xeon 3.20 478

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 97 Watt

Pentium Dual-Core E2160 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 49.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is a desktop processor while Xeon 3.20 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual-Core E2160 and Xeon 3.20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Intel Xeon 3.20
Xeon 3.20

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 226 votes

Rate Pentium Dual-Core E2160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon 3.20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual-Core E2160 or Xeon 3.20, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.