Xeon 3.06 vs Pentium D 960

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium D 960
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.51
+50%
Xeon 3.06
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 97 Watt
0.34

Pentium D 960 outperforms Xeon 3.06 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28823077
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.370.33
Architecture codenamePresler (2005−2007)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release date23 April 2006 (18 years ago)March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$523no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.07 GHz
L1 cache16 KB (per core)16K
L2 cache2 MB (per die)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2237 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors376 million286 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775,PLGA775604
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt97 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium D 960 0.51
+50%
Xeon 3.06 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium D 960 807
+51.4%
Xeon 3.06 533

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 0.34
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 97 Watt

Pentium D 960 has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 3.06, on the other hand, has 34% lower power consumption.

The Pentium D 960 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 3.06 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium D 960 is a desktop processor while Xeon 3.06 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 960 and Xeon 3.06, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960
Intel Xeon 3.06
Xeon 3.06

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 46 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 960 or Xeon 3.06, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.