Pentium E5300 vs Pentium D 840

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.04
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data0.83
Architecture codenameSmithfield (2005)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache28 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size206 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C74 °C
Number of transistors169 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium E5300 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 840 and Pentium E5300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 840
Pentium D 840
Intel Pentium E5300
Pentium E5300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate Pentium D 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 588 votes

Rate Pentium E5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 840 or Pentium E5300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.