Celeron M 450 vs Pentium D 840

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiencyno data0.49
Architecture codenameSmithfield (2005)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache28 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size206 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Number of transistors169 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4V1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPLGA775PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 27 Watt

Pentium D 840 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 450, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 381.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium D 840 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 450 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 840 and Celeron M 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 840
Pentium D 840
Intel Celeron M 450
Celeron M 450

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate Pentium D 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 13 votes

Rate Celeron M 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 840 or Celeron M 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.