Ultra 7 258V vs Pentium A1020

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium A1020
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.80
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.52
+1465%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Pentium A1020 by a whopping 1465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2615621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency7.4368.40
Architecture codenameno dataLunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 January 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data

Security technologies

Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesArc 140V
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency896 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium A1020 0.80
Ultra 7 258V 12.52
+1465%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium A1020 1249
Ultra 7 258V 19509
+1462%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 12.52
Recency 1 January 2016 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Pentium A1020 has 70% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 1465% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium A1020 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium A1020 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium A1020
Pentium A1020
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Pentium A1020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium A1020 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.