Celeron J1800 vs Pentium 4 P4 3.0
Aggregate performance score
Celeron J1800 outperforms Pentium 4 P4 3.0 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3225 | 3050 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.22 | 3.40 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | no data | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.41 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | - |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 0.36 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron J1800 has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 790% lower power consumption.
The Celeron J1800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 P4 3.0 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium 4 P4 3.0 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
