EPYC 7H12 vs Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.16
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
43.84
+27300%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 27300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking329448
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPentium 4-MAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.5014.81
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateno data18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 43.84
Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 280 Watt

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 has 833.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has a 27300% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 452 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.