Duron 800 vs Pentium 4-M 2.50

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4-M 2.50 and Duron 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateApril 2003 (21 year ago)14 May 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4-M 2.50 and Duron 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz0.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache8 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size131 mm2105.68 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors55 million25 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4-M 2.50 and Duron 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4-M 2.50 and Duron 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Pentium 4-M 2.50 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 800, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4-M 2.50 and Duron 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium 4-M 2.50 is a notebook processor while Duron 800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M 2.50 and Duron 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4-M 2.50
Pentium 4-M 2.50
AMD Duron 800
Duron 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium 4-M 2.50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 10 votes

Rate Duron 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4-M 2.50 or Duron 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.