EPYC 9845 vs Pentium 4-M 1.70

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Turin (2024)
Release dateMarch 2002 (22 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,564

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)160
Threads1320
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache8 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors55 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 160
Threads 1 320
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 390 Watt

Pentium 4-M 1.70 has 1200% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has 15900% more physical cores and 31900% more threads, and a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium 4-M 1.70 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M 1.70 and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4-M 1.70
Pentium 4-M 1.70
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium 4-M 1.70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4-M 1.70 or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.