Xeon 3.2 vs Pentium 4 HT 670

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Irwindale (2004)
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache28 KB16 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors169 million178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775604
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 135 Watt

Pentium 4 HT 670 has 100% more threads, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 HT 670 is a desktop processor while Xeon 3.2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 670 and Xeon 3.2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 HT 670
Pentium 4 HT 670
Intel Xeon 3.2
Xeon 3.2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 24 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 3.2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 HT 670 or Xeon 3.2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.