Xeon E5-1428L vs Pentium 4 HT 516
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1430 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.21 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | 14 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 0 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 15360 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 294 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 1,270 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | FCLGA1356 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 32 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 60 Watt |
Xeon E5-1428L has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 HT 516 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1428L is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 516 and Xeon E5-1428L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
