Athlon MP 2000+ vs Pentium 4 HT 3.0E

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and Athlon MP 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateFebruary 2004 (20 years ago)27 August 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$319

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and Athlon MP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data12.5
L1 cache16 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size109 mm285 mm2
Number of transistors125 million37 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and Athlon MP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
Socket478no data
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt58.2 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and Athlon MP 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 58 Watt

Pentium 4 HT 3.0E has 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 2000+, on the other hand, has 98.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and Athlon MP 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 HT 3.0E is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2000+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and Athlon MP 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
AMD Athlon MP 2000+
Athlon MP 2000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 59 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.0E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 HT 3.0E or Athlon MP 2000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.