Opteron X2 290 vs Pentium 4 630
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3283 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Pentium 4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Prescott 2M | Italy (2005−2006) |
| Release date | no data | 1 January 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 233 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.2V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PLGA775 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 95 Watt |
Pentium 4 630 has 13.1% lower power consumption.
Opteron X2 290, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 290 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 290, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
