Core i3-350M vs Pentium 4 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 4Intel Core i3
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MArrandale (2010−2011)
Release dateno data7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$130

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.267 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus support800 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataBGA1288, PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
i3-350M 1084
+299%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium 4 630 1605
i3-350M 2453
+52.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium 4 630 1975
i3-350M 5843
+196%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4 630 103
i3-350M 22.61
+356%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

i3-350M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Core i3-350M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Core i3-350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 121 vote

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 240 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Core i3-350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.