Celeron M 360 vs Pentium 4 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 4 630
1 core / 2 threads, 84 Watt
0.17
+21.4%
Celeron M 360
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.14

Pentium 4 630 outperforms Celeron M 360 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32773334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 4Celeron M
Power efficiency0.170.63
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MDothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4V1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPLGA775PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 4 630 0.17
+21.4%
Celeron M 360 0.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
+23.1%
Celeron M 360 221

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4 630 103
+27.2%
Celeron M 360 131

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.14
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 21 Watt

Pentium 4 630 has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 4 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 127 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Celeron M 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.