Celeron 4205U vs Pentium 4 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 4Intel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data5.41
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate800 MHz4 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPLGA775FCBGA1528
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 8th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
Celeron 4205U 1367
+403%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 4205U has 100% more physical cores, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 460% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Celeron 4205U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 4205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Celeron 4205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.