Celeron 1007U vs Pentium 4 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 4Intel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data2.95
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI
Bus rate800 MHz5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPLGA775FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
Celeron 1007U 839
+208%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 1007U has 100% more physical cores, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 394.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Celeron 1007U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron 1007U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 124 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Celeron 1007U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.