Atom x5-Z8350 vs Pentium 4 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 45x Intel Atom
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MCherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.92 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPLGA775UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)84 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno data4 GB
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
Atom x5-Z8350 892
+228%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium 4 630 1605
+77.8%
Atom x5-Z8350 903

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium 4 630 1975
Atom x5-Z8350 2979
+50.8%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4 630 103
Atom x5-Z8350 36.2
+185%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Atom x5-Z8350 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Atom x5-Z8350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Atom x5-Z8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 376 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Atom x5-Z8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.