A6-9220 vs Pentium 4 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 4 630
1 core / 2 threads, 84 Watt
0.17
A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.81
+376%

A6-9220 outperforms Pentium 4 630 by a whopping 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32632594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 4Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.175.11
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPLGA775BGA
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 4 630 0.17
A6-9220 0.81
+376%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
A6-9220 1283
+372%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium 4 630 1605
A6-9220 2432
+51.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium 4 630 1975
A6-9220 3941
+99.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4 630 103
A6-9220 27.71
+272%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.81
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 10 Watt

A6-9220 has a 376.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 740% lower power consumption.

The A6-9220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 630 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while A6-9220 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and A6-9220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
AMD A6-9220
A6-9220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 403 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or A6-9220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.