A8 Pro-7150B vs Pentium 4 560
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2484 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Pentium 4 | AMD Kaveri |
Power efficiency | no data | 4.80 |
Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L2 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 245 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 2410 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | FP3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 19 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
FRTC | - | + |
TrueAudio | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
Out-of-band client management | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
RAID | - | + |
HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1600 |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
Number of pipelines | no data | 384 |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 19 Watt |
A8 Pro-7150B has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 363.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 560 is a desktop processor while A8 Pro-7150B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 560 and A8 Pro-7150B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.