Celeron E3300 vs Pentium 4 506
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2874 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.83 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.73 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 30 August 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $70 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PLGA775 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron E3300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 29.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 506 and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
