Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium 4 506

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)1 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache16 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPLGA775Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Turbo Boost Technology-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 506 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 506 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 506
Pentium 4 506
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 14 votes

Rate Pentium 4 506 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 35 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 506 or Celeron Dual-Core T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.