Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Pentium 4 2.26
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 647 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 25 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Rembrandt R (2023) |
| Release date | January 2002 (22 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 4.55 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 478 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 660M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7535HS has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 214.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 2.26 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 2.26 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
