Celeron 3965U vs Pentium 3825U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3825U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.88
Celeron 3965U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.09
+23.9%

Celeron 3965U outperforms Pentium 3825U by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25632418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.556.88
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response-+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency850 MHz900 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3825U 0.88
Celeron 3965U 1.09
+23.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3825U 1399
Celeron 3965U 1732
+23.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium 3825U 338
Celeron 3965U 442
+30.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium 3825U 686
Celeron 3965U 790
+15.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 1.09
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.85
Recency 1 March 2015 3 January 2017
Threads 4 2

Pentium 3825U has 100% more threads.

Celeron 3965U, on the other hand, has a 23.9% higher aggregate performance score, 140.3% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Celeron 3965U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3825U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3965U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U
Intel Celeron 3965U
Celeron 3965U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 72 votes

Rate Pentium 3825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3965U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3825U or Celeron 3965U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.