Celeron N3350 vs Pentium 3560Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3560Y
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 11 Watt
0.56
Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.70
+25%

Celeron N3350 outperforms Pentium 3560Y by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28252707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.4211.04
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$24

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect+-
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio++
RST+-

Security technologies

Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency850 MHz650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes126
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports42
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports42
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports48
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3560Y 0.56
Celeron N3350 0.70
+25%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3560Y 887
Celeron N3350 1107
+24.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium 3560Y 267
+6%
Celeron N3350 252

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium 3560Y 484
+15.8%
Celeron N3350 418

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pentium 3560Y 1
Celeron N3350 1
+8.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.70
Recency 1 September 2013 30 August 2016
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N3350 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 83.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3560Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3560Y and Celeron N3350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3560Y
Pentium 3560Y
Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Pentium 3560Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 956 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3560Y or Celeron N3350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.