Atom Z3770 vs Pentium 3558U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.65
+41.3%
Atom Z3770
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.46

Pentium 3558U outperforms Atom Z3770 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27452919
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency4.105.44
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$37

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3558U 0.65
+41.3%
Atom Z3770 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3558U 1040
+41.3%
Atom Z3770 736

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium 3558U 2510
+111%
Atom Z3770 1189

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium 3558U 4852
+22.5%
Atom Z3770 3961

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium 3558U 1926
Atom Z3770 2212
+14.8%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 3558U 46.24
Atom Z3770 26.55
+74.2%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Pentium 3558U 0.1
Atom Z3770 0.9
+562%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Pentium 3558U 9
+18.7%
Atom Z3770 8

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Pentium 3558U 49
+20.8%
Atom Z3770 40

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Pentium 3558U 1124
+25.2%
Atom Z3770 898

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Pentium 3558U 2592
Atom Z3770 3035
+17.1%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Pentium 3558U 1468
+49.7%
Atom Z3770 981

Geekbench 2

Pentium 3558U 3127
+1.4%
Atom Z3770 3085

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.46
Recency 1 January 2014 27 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

Pentium 3558U has a 41.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

Atom Z3770, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 3558U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3558U and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 105 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3558U or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.