Core 2 Duo E8500 vs Pentium 3550M

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3550M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.84
+5%
Core 2 Duo E8500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80

Pentium 3550M outperforms Core 2 Duo E8500 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25732596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency2.151.16
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.17 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s1333 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3550M 0.84
+5%
Core 2 Duo E8500 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3550M 1330
+4.1%
Core 2 Duo E8500 1278

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 0.80
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium 3550M has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 75.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500.

Be aware that Pentium 3550M is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E8500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3550M and Core 2 Duo E8500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3550M
Pentium 3550M
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Core 2 Duo E8500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 41 vote

Rate Pentium 3550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 627 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3550M or Core 2 Duo E8500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.