E2-3800 vs PRO A6-8570E

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A6-8570E
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.03
+41.1%
E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.73

PRO A6-8570E outperforms E2-3800 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24362675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.504.61
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release dateOctober 2018 (6 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1024 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FT3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-1600
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8280
iGPU core count4no data
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics++
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A6-8570E 1.03
+41.1%
E2-3800 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A6-8570E 1642
+42.5%
E2-3800 1152

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 0.73
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

PRO A6-8570E has a 41.1% higher aggregate performance score.

E2-3800, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The PRO A6-8570E is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3800 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A6-8570E is a desktop processor while E2-3800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A6-8570E and E2-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A6-8570E
PRO A6-8570E
AMD E2-3800
E2-3800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 13 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A6-8570E or E2-3800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.