Atom x5-Z8350 vs PRO A6-8570E

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A6-8570E
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.03
+83.9%

PRO A6-8570E outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24382823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.50no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release dateOctober 2018 (6 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.92 GHz
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-24004 GB
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
iGPU core count4no data
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Switchable graphics+-
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A6-8570E 1.03
+83.9%
Atom x5-Z8350 0.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A6-8570E 1642
+84.1%
Atom x5-Z8350 892

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 0.56
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

PRO A6-8570E has a 83.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-Z8350, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The PRO A6-8570E is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A6-8570E is a desktop processor while Atom x5-Z8350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A6-8570E and Atom x5-Z8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A6-8570E
PRO A6-8570E
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 13 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 377 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A6-8570E or Atom x5-Z8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.