Xeon E-2488 vs PRO A6-8570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A6-8570
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.20
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.38
+1432%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms PRO A6-8570 by a whopping 1432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2348326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.7418.21
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateOctober 2018 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size250 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A6-8570 1.20
Xeon E-2488 18.38
+1432%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A6-8570 1906
Xeon E-2488 29191
+1432%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 18.38
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

PRO A6-8570 has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 1431.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-8570 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A6-8570 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A6-8570 and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A6-8570
PRO A6-8570
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 32 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A6-8570 or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.