A6-4400M vs PRO A6-8570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A6-8570
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.20
+87.5%
A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64

PRO A6-8570 outperforms A6-4400M by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23372763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.751.73
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release dateOctober 2018 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors3,100 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400unknown
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 7520G
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A6-8570 1.20
+87.5%
A6-4400M 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A6-8570 1906
+88.7%
A6-4400M 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 0.64
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

PRO A6-8570 has a 87.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A6-4400M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The PRO A6-8570 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Note that PRO A6-8570 is a desktop processor while A6-4400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A6-8570 and A6-4400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A6-8570
PRO A6-8570
AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 32 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 187 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A6-8570 or A6-4400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.