Ultra 7 265 vs PRO A12-8870E

VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1963not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.14no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size250 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors3,100 million17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM41851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
iGPU core count8no data
Enduron/a-
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

PRO A12-8870E has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870E and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-8870E
PRO A12-8870E
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 8 votes

Rate PRO A12-8870E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-8870E or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.