Ryzen 7 7800X vs A10-7860K
Primary details
Comparing A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1887 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
Power efficiency | 3.01 | no data |
Architecture codename | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Zen 4 |
Release date | 2 February 2016 (8 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 5 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 8 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 96 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 71+122 mm |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,411 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FM2+ | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | no data |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 512 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
A10-7860K has 84.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7860K and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.