A10-5800B vs PRO A10-8770E

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8770E
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.91
A10-5800B
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.91

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19731974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.161.81
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 7660D
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8770E 1.91
A10-5800B 1.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8770E 3036
+0.1%
A10-5800B 3034

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

PRO A10-8770E 579
+26.1%
A10-5800B 459

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

PRO A10-8770E 1315
+16.6%
A10-5800B 1128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

PRO A10-8770E has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770E and A10-5800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770E
PRO A10-8770E
AMD A10-5800B
A10-5800B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 99 votes

Rate A10-5800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770E or A10-5800B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.